Posts Tagged ‘New Media’

h1

New Media in Public Relations

April 1, 2009

The buzz surrounding new media is nearly impossible to ignore these days, particularly as multiple industries are still working out where exactly it fits in to their strategy.  The PR industry in particular is in the process of adapting to this new medium.  This blog contributes to the new media discussion through multiple posts, and so to avoid being repetitive, this particular post will mainly refer to previous discussions.  

Posts from January all address some aspect of new media, and serve as a closer look at individual platforms and their application towards business-to-business and consumer public relations.  Posts from March are examples of new media content produced for the course.  Take a look for a more detailed analysis of specific new media tools.

However, one aspect of new media that I would like to delve into a bit further is Twitter.  Twitter seems to be all the rage at the moment because of the almost instantaneous distribution of news events.

An example of the power of Twitter just from today is the G20 protests occurring in London.  The Financial Times feature their own feed on Twitter devoted to the protests.  Tweets include: “Stuff being thrown at helmeted police guarding front of RBS,” “Some talk of sitting down to stop the police forcing the crowd back,” and “Riot police charging the crowd outside the front door of RBS branch.  Protestors throwing bottles.”  Multiple tweets are being added every minute at times.  The information in this case comes from an established news organization, but the search feature on Twitter displays comments from countless others experiencing the protests.    

What are you doing?

What are you doing?

 This kind of up-to-the-second information is unrivaled anywhere in traditional media and is significant to all communications disciplines involved in the media.  Twitter is influencing not only the way people consume their news in that it is expected in a more immediate way, but changing the way news organizations are reporting.  Frequent, if not continuous updates of 140 characters or less have now become an acceptable way of communicating the news.  

My interest lies in the longevity of Twitter and what the long term impact of the platform will be.  Sure it is an incredibly useful tool now, but for how long?  As is the case with many new media platforms, it’s often too early to tell how long each platform will remain relevant or what other new platforms might come along and steal the spotlight.  Only time will tell I suppose, but the potential implications that these new communications tools could have for our industry are worth looking out for.  

The new media module was particularly interesting to me because the industry is still in the process of adapting to it.  Best-practice isn’t available for every new media tool and there usually aren’t hard and fast rules for each form either.  Experiencing the change in the industry as it happens is exciting and I greatly look forward to my future in the industry for that reason.  

h1

The Debate Continues: New Media is a Threat to Traditional Media

March 2, 2009

CONTACT INFORMATION:
Katy McDougal (Spokesperson)
KPRM
Associate Director
Black Lion House
45 Whitechapel Road
London
E1 1DU
United Kingdom‎
0207.443.5592 (office)
0207.443.7668 (fax)
0207.589.8373 (cell)
katy.mcdougal (im)
Email: katy.mcdougal@kprm.co.uk

Web site: http://www.kprm.co.uk

Blog: http://katymcdougal.wordpress.com/

The Debate Continues: New Media is a Threat to Traditional Media

Katy McDougal shares her PR expertise and experience with a slidecast that continues the debate about the impact of new media.

London, UK – 1 March 2009

  • KPRM released slidecast as a follow-up to the Public Relations Consultants Association’s (PRCA) conference on ”The State of Traditional Media.”
  • New media currently poses a threat to Traditional Media.
  • New media content is available quicker and to a more global audience.
  • Content consumption data increases targeting and measurement opportunities in new media.
  • Cost to produce new media is lower.
  • New media must overcome poor advertising revenue models, limited penetration in homes, and questions of journalistic credibility. 

 

 

MULTIMEDIA ELEMENTS:

QUOTES

“We’re making great strides and progress in the PR industry.  It feels good to see more professionals being open minded about the changes and participating in Social Media.”  – Deirdre Breakenridge, author of PR 2.0

“Every communications professional should pay close attention to this debate.  Acknowledging the underlying significance of new media and the impact it will have on our profession is critical as our industry continues to incorporate these new and powerful tools.”  – Kevin Howard, President, CIPR  

“This examination of both the strengths and shortcomings of new media tools reminds us that we are still very much on the forefront of these newer technologies.  As the media continues to evolve, so must the communications profession adapt. ”  – Michael Klein, Executive Editor, Media Guardian

ABOUT KPRM

KPRM is a London-based communications agency specialising in consumer public relations and branding.  Founded in 2002, this young and energetic agency offers a variety of services to best establish and maintain brand positioning for long term success.   

For further information about KPRM, please see our website: www.kprm.co.uk

 

RELATED LINKS

PR Week UK Technology News
RSS feed containing the latest new media and technology news updates

New Media Age Newsfeed
RSS feed containing the latest news in new media, advertising, internet, marketing, mobile and interactive televison

Media Guardian Newsfeed
RSS feed containing the latest news from the Guardian’s media section

Technorati Tags: | | | | | | |

h1

New Media Slidecast

March 2, 2009

The following slidecast (an audio podcast combined with a slideshow presentation) examines the threat that new media poses to traditional media:

In related news, there is further evidence to suggest that newspapers are struggling to stay profitable.  The New York Times began to sell front page display advertising space in early 2009 for the first time in the paper’s history.   The last major US newspaper to refrain from front page ads now is the Washington Post.  The Business Insider suggests that the Post hasn’t had to sell this ad space yet because they are owned by a healthy education company rather than a struggling media company.

This CBS advert is the first front page ad that the New York Times has ever run.

h1

Social Media Q&A

January 10, 2009

A lot of people are talking about this topic, and one person in particular that I’ve had quite a few conversations with about social media is Desiree Banugo. She works as a Marketing Communications consultant and specializes in social media and internet marketing. She has a really interesting point of view that I’d like to share with you all in the form of a formal Q&A.

Q: In your opinion, is all the hype around new media justified? desiree1

A: Absolutely! However in some markets it will seem more like hype ie business 2 business sector and in others, new media has totally revolutionised their industries such as adult entertainment, music, TV, advertising, newspapers and general retail.

Q: What do you think makes new media a successful (or unsuccessful) method of communication?

A:

  • Constantly evolving – it keeps up and at times leads business into new frontiers of communication technologies and challenges the status quo
  • Accessibility – widens the reach to a global platform for all messages to mass and even niche markets
  • Immediacy – the time required to publish or acquire information is almost instant compared to the print media which is a minimum of next day.
  • Communication real estate – low cost of new media supports the inclusion of text, rich media and other formats which would be incredibly expensive in traditional media
  • Democratising – levels the playing field for solopreneurs and small businesses with no to low budgets to reach their prospective consumers
  • Information wealth - audiences can search and view multiple viewpoints on any subject or issue and thereby also contribute to the conversation
  • The customer is truly king – the brand management team also includes the customer – they build (and can also kill) a brand. This may also facilitate a company’s R & D efforts to beat it’s competitors
  • Tone of voice – new media doesn’t exclude by geography, dialect, accent, language, class or political affinity unlike some other mediums like newspapers. It’s very conversational in its nature and publishers target their audiences primarily by interest.

Versus

  • Lack of control of messages once it reaches the public domain
  • Time and physical effort to continually feed the social media marketing machine
  • Fast evolution leaves users eating the dust trying to catch up and the investment (time and money) required to upgrade knowledge banks and resources to do so
  • Slow adoption of new media techniques in the mainstream may cause disputes in the industry resulting in glitches in growth cycle of a business.


Q: Does PR 2.0 have a place in non-consumer sectors?

A: Yes it does. As trade journal circulations numbers dwindle, many editors and journalists will become bloggers and form/join blogger networks according to particular interests. Traditional press releases and press campaigns cannot be transposed for the digital media space and will have to be adapted. I think as this is quite a new-ish area for PR, (they are about 10 years behind traditional marketing), there will be many trials and errors before adopting an acceptable best practice across the industry.


Q: Are there any areas of web 2.0 that you think PRs are overlooking? Are there any that are already over saturated or over hyped?

A: PRs should be paying close attention to the social media which is tailored toward their interests. Social media also broaches that overlap that PR has with marketing, and that’s purely until more businesses get with using social media for b2b purposes.

In general, PRs should be using a blog as their central social media. It’s the one site that they can control and position as the authoritative voice, opinion and viewpoint of their client.

Secondly, PRs must use the top general social media to raise the profile of the clients:

  • Facebook (any sector)
  • Myspace (entertainment, media or arts sectors only)
  • Bebo (youth, and youth-related consumer brands)
  • Youtube (any sector)
  • Twitter (any sector)

But before all of this, PRs need to clarify what they need to achieve using social media and craft their activities with that purpose in mind.

I don’t think that any are over saturated or over hyped because I do feel that those people with a distinct disdain for web 2.0 is due to disappointment because they didn’t know what to do and how to do it successfully. And the message is simple. Create a profile and get involved in existing conversations without plugging a product (consumer web 2.0 marketing). For business to business 2.0 marketing, there are many business social networks around now, and it’s a case of finding the site where all your potential contacts will be networking and introduce yourself, offering to help where you can. Just like in traditional business networking.

Q: How do you think new media will change the PR industry in the next 5 years?

A: Many TV stations are asking for the public to create the news by uploading news and picture stories directly into the studio, thereby leaving the PR industry in a precarious position. Now look at the democratized internet where a news story could be published as a video, blog post or picture story within 5 minutes of the event.

The PR industry may become restricted to big campaigns and therefore end up merging with digital media and advertising agencies as the overlap between the two grows bigger and bigger.

The role of a PR will change drastically as media relations activity will change to blogger/webmaster activity primarily via email or something like Twitter.

I see PR agencies becoming or forming their own newswires or portals, particularly the larger ones as they will have to disseminate information themselves to retain the ‘freshness’ of news.

Q: What potential effect could being a late adopter of new media have on a brand?

A: 5 years ago, many business advisers and marketers strongly recommended that all businesses must have an online presence. It is said that those that didn’t do so died, even at the peak of the recent boom economy.

Now an online presence is not enough, in order to build an awareness of any brand and get unsolicited advocates, the brand must be endorsed by customers, opinion formers and influencers. There must be lots of easily accessible information for prospective customers to view, interact with and contribute to if they wish. Ideally, the more interactive a brand is online as well as offline and the experience offered will surely get people talking.

In my opinion, it’s best to get started now and figure it out on the way, than be the last company in through the new media gate.

And yet another point of view worth considering! I think Desiree brings up a lot of valid points about social media and many of these points deserve a deeper look so I’ll be expanding on these ideas later in the blog. If you’d like to check out her blog, you can find it here. Thanks, Desiree!

h1

PodCamp Panel

January 10, 2009

I stumbled upon this video on the socialdays.com blog (written by Jane Quigley, Relationship Director for crayon). It’s just under an hour long but is extremely relevant to this discussion of social media and its place in the discipline of PR. It is a panel discussion at Podcamp Boston from August 2008.

So you might ask, as I did, what is PodCamp? According to their wiki, “A PodCamp is a usually free BarCamp-style community UnConference for new media enthusiasts and professionals.” Podcamps started in 2006 in Boston, Massachusetts, but are now held in cities all over the world. Judging by the panel discussion, this would be a great event to attend because new media’s relevance to the field of PR is certainly something that all PRs should be talking about.

h1

What’s now and what’s next for PR 2.0?

January 8, 2009
Deirdre Breakenridge (2008)

PR 2.0: New Media, New Tools, New Audiences - Deirdre Breakenridge (2008)

I picked up PR 2.0 hoping to gain a better understanding of new media and what impact it will have on the PR industry in the near future. After finishing the book, I can say that I do feel better informed about the current state of new media in the PR industry and where the possibilities lie for the future. Breakenridge uses a combination of her own industry insight and multiple Q&As with industry professionals to demonstrate how new media tools can be an asset to todays PRs.

One of the primary messages of this book is that new media is here and it’s not going anywhere. Mark Regan, CEO of Regan Communications, warns of an inevitability to move toward social media that will mean if you don’t do it, your competitor will. The challenge that PRs then face is how best to incorporate new media into a communications strategy in a relevant way, and not just for the sake of doing something new.

But is new media really for everyone? Consumer PR seems to be far more involved in new media activities than non-consumer PR at this stage. This discrepancy is discussed quite a few times throughout the book, and will be one of the central focuses of my blog. Thom Brodeur, Senior Vice President at Marketwire, addresses this issue in a Q&A with the author.

“Q: Would you say that B2C are Early Adopters of social media and B2B brands are a little slower?

A: From our perspective, there’s obvious utility to both markets, but what you’ve seen is that consumer brands really leveraged social media earlier. This largely occurred because, if you think about it, even in the traditional sense, consumer brands are typically more interested in pushing their messages to the public because of the benefits of word-of-mouth and viral marketing.”

Brodeur goes on suggest that B2B brands should also get involved in social media, both as a means of presenting themselves differently and also as a way of making their message a bit more user friendly.

For both consumer and non-consumer sectors, a significant benefit of incorporating new media is the creation of a two-way conversation between the company and the end user. This argument made by Breakenridge and supported by multiple experts throughout the book is something that could potentially be a significant force of change for the PR industry. Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia and Web 2.0 guru, provided the following insight on the impact of social media:

“(Y)ou have to understand that it’s very different from a broadcast-oriented world where you control the message and you put your message up… The conversation about your product is no longer just between you and your customers. Now, you actually get to listen to your customers talk to each other. The difficult part – you can’t control the conversation; you can participate in it, but you can’t control it!”

Bottom line, if you’re interested in new media and PR 2.0, this book is worth the read. Whether you agree with her or not, Breakenridge raises some very thought-provoking points about new media and the potential impact on the PR industry. Check out Google Book Search for a limited preview of PR 2.0. Not all pages are included but you can browse quite a few pages, and the search tool helps!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.